Measuring Light and Achieving the Correct Exposure

How do you measure the power of the light from your studio lighting to ensure perfect results? Do you apply visual, theoretical, histogram or light meter readings to achieve the best results?

Karl discusses the best ways to measure light and achieve the desired exposure as well as the limitations of the above methods and why it’s important to truly understand light if you want complete creative control.

In this photography class we cover the following:

  • Different methods for measuring light
  • Light meters — what use are they in digital photography
  • Assessing exposure visually
  • Combining aperture and shutter speed to achieve desired exposure
  • Reading histograms
  • Correctly exposing for different textures

NOTE: This photography class is available with English subtitles.

Comments

  1. Hi Karl,

    You mention shooting tethered…
    Is that subject covered in another section of the course?

    Cheers
    Nick

  2. Hi Karl, loving your course. However, I am going to have to disagree with you on this chapter. You are so adamant about not using a light meter that you are not fully honestly representing the use of a light meter. First, the light meter I have allows me to set the aperture I want to use and then it shows me the shutter speed and/or ISO I want it to calculate ( or any combination of aperture, shutter speed and ISO that I want to select). Second, I don’t think a serious photographer is going to follow a light meter settings blindly (just like you don’t follow your in camera meter/histogram blindly when shooting weddings where the bride is in white and the groom is in black), they will add their creativity to the final setting they will use. Today’s light meters calculate ratios and other things. I think a light meter can be a fine tool for outdoor creative photography, whether it be a model/senior/environmental shoot, or doing black and white zone system shooting. We cannot always be tethered, nor can we always rely on the histogram. However, if you are only referring to “in studio” shoots, then perhaps the title of this chapter could include the “Studio” in the title or in your presentation. And to say someone does not understand light or is trying to justify their purchase, just because they use a light meter, is not true.

    That being said, I still love your courses and your expert and professional presentation of the material. Moving on to the next course, see you there.

    1. Just realize the “Overall Course Title” says “…use studio lighting”, by bad! Continue on sir!

      1. Hi CharClarPhoto, yes the information in this class was relating purely to measuring the output of studio flash lighting and where I see the fallibility in doing so compared to analysing the results visually (which is also using a light meter, just your eyes and brain instead). For me and many other professionals the ethos of good studio lighting is about creating mood and emotion through the choice of modifiers and the look and feeling of the light – this is something that doesn’t need a light meter it simply needs an artists eye. Additionally in such a studio lighting environment the aperture, the ISO and the shutter speed should already have been predetermined so the only thing left is to decide on the amount of light which can simply be turned up or down like a volume control until the desired result is achieved.

    2. AGREED!

      I have a light meter that works with aperture priority or shutter priority. It has an incident meter, flash meter, and spot meter along with the ability to store multiple ISO’s and be programed for your digital camera’s sensor…. I can obviously get the photo I need with a raw file and the ability to see if I’m clipping shadows and highlights on a modern digital camera, but I still shoot film and trusting the in camera meter isn’t an option.

Leave a Comment